Obligation Map
Submission quality depends on whether each prompt has a real owner and real evidence.
This lane maps comment obligations to impact areas, readiness, and the evidence gaps that still need operational closure.
| Section | Obligation | Owner | Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 4.2(a) Economic impact | Show measurable implementation burden for mid-market operators, not only enterprise examples. | Research Ops | yellow |
| Appendix B Technical evidence | Tie telemetry claims to named system-of-record exports and retention windows. | Platform Engineering | red |
| Question 7 Workflow operations | Explain how proposed language changes would affect review cycle time and staff workload. | RevOps Strategy | green |
| Request for Comment 12 Governance controls | Map consumer-protection concerns to actual release controls and review gates. | Compliance PM | yellow |
Evidence Gaps
Where approval is likely to slow down.
OB-11 · Research Ops
Need one more benchmark from a smaller deployment profile.
Economic impact · § 4.2(a)OB-19 · Platform Engineering
Retention evidence is fragmented across logging and analytics teams.
Technical evidence · Appendix BOB-23 · RevOps Strategy
No blocking gap; cycle-time model already attached.
Workflow operations · Question 7OB-28 · Compliance PM
Need final screenshot pack from the release workflow system.
Governance controls · Request for Comment 12