Medieval Bosnia · 1189

15-second film · landscape · English

Manuscript into place

On 29 August 1189, Ban Kulin of Bosnia put a promise to the people of Dubrovnik in writing. Three copies of the charter survive, and which one is the original is debated. This film shows that, and only that, with every claim graded and every reconstruction labelled.

Watch

15.000 s1920×108030 fpsstereo sound Captions are burned in. A tag on screen says the surface and ink are generated and the lines are an English rendering of a published translation.

Text version of the film

0.5 to 2.2 s. A generated aged sheet. The date "29 AUGUST 1189" is written in ink. Caption: "Ban Kulin of Bosnia writes to Dubrovnik."

4.0 to 10.0 s. Three lines are inked: "I, Kulin, ban of Bosnia, / promise you, Krvaš, / and all the citizens of Dubrovnik:". Captions: "He promises Dubrovnik's people safe passage and trade in his lands." then "Written by the scribe Radoje, in Bosnian Cyrillic."

10.0 to 12.5 s. The ink fades and the sheet slides apart into three labelled sheets: Saint Petersburg, Dubrovnik (whole sheet), Dubrovnik (corner missing). Caption: "Three copies survive. Which is the original is debated."

12.8 to 15.0 s. End card: "The charter's place in national histories is contested." Source: Z. Karavdić, "O Povelji Kulina bana" (c. 2009).

Sound: synthesized room tone, quill-like ink scratches, paper rustle, one soft low thud when the sheets separate. Not claimed to be historical or authentic.

Key frames

A generated aged sheet with the date 29 August 1189 written in ink, with the caption: Ban Kulin of Bosnia writes to Dubrovnik.
2.0 s. The date is inked.
The sheet now carries three inked lines in English: I, Kulin, ban of Bosnia, promise you, Krvaš, and all the citizens of Dubrovnik. Caption: He promises Dubrovnik's people safe passage and trade in his lands.
6.2 s. The promise, as an English rendering.
The same sheet with the caption: Written by the scribe Radoje, in Bosnian Cyrillic.
9.4 s. The scribe and the script.
Three blank sheets side by side, labelled Saint Petersburg, Dubrovnik whole sheet, and Dubrovnik corner missing, with the caption: Three copies survive. Which is the original is debated.
11.6 s. Three copies, one debate. The third sheet is missing one lower corner.
End card on a dark background: The charter's place in national histories is contested. Source: Z. Karavdić, O Povelji Kulina bana, c. 2009.
14.2 s. End card. The tag at top left stays on screen for the whole film.

What the film claims, and how sure we are

Every claim on screen comes from an approved fact sheet. Four grades:

VERIFIED

Two or more independent sources, or the document's own colophon as a scholar renders it.

ATTRIBUTED

One source says it, and the source is named.

CONTESTED

Scholars or public narratives disagree.

UNVERIFIED

Not confirmed, so the film does not say it.

ClaimGradeBasis and film rule
Issued 29 August 1189VERIFIEDThe colophon, as Karavdić renders it, gives day, month and year and names the feast. Four secondary sources agree.
Issuer: Kulin, ban of Bosnia, c. 1180 to 1204VERIFIEDThe text opens with the ban naming himself. One municipal source ends his reign in 1203, so the dates are approximate.
Addressed to knez Krvaš and the citizens of DubrovnikVERIFIEDSources translate Krvaš's title two ways, so the film leaves it out.
Content: friendship, safe travel and trade, no violence from his officials, help while they stay, an oath on the GospelVERIFIEDKaravdić's full modern translation.
"No toll"CONTESTED WORDINGOne source says toll-free. Karavdić renders the clause differently. The film avoids the phrase.
Scribe: Radoje, "the ban's scribe"VERIFIEDColophon as rendered by Karavdić, plus one secondary source.
Slavic text in Bosnian Cyrillic, plus a Latin textVERIFIEDThe film does not draw or imitate the letterforms.
Three copies: Saint Petersburg, and two in DubrovnikVERIFIEDKaravdić (copies A, B, C), the Zemaljski muzej BiH, and two news sources.
Which copy is the originalCONTESTEDThe film says only that it is debated.
What the copies are written onUNVERIFIEDNo material is named. The generated sheet is not a claim.
One Dubrovnik copy is on a whole sheet, the other on a damaged sheet missing a lower cornerATTRIBUTEDKaravdić's figure captions and footnote, checked against the reproduction in her PDF. The shape of the loss is not known.
Kulin's Bosnia is not modern Bosnia and HerzegovinaATTRIBUTEDWikipedia's account of the banate. The film shows no map and no borders.

What the film leaves out on purpose

Three directions were proposed. One was built.

Before animating, three visual directions were drafted and labelled. Direction B became the film. These stills are proposal-stage artwork, shown as a record of the process. Their on-image text was not fact-checked to the standard of the final film.

Direction A: a carved stone slab with relief motifs, lit from the side, labelled as a composite study and not a specific monument.
A. Stone into memory. A composite of documented stećak motifs under raking light. Not built.
Direction B: an aged sheet with a transliterated invocation, next to the date and a summary of the Charter of Ban Kulin.
B. Manuscript into place. The charter as the visual foundation. Built. This proposal-stage still is superseded: it says “Republic of Ragusa,” “no toll” and “parchment,” which the fact sheet later rejected. See the key frames above for the final film.
Direction C: three stacked paper sheets with contour lines, labelled 1396, 1463 and 1527, a schematic of Jajce.
C. Layers of a Bosnian city. Jajce, 1396 to 1527, as a schematic. Not built.

How it was checked

15.000 sduration, 450 frames
−15.1 LUFSintegrated loudness
−1.4 dBFStrue peak
≥ 16.8 : 1caption contrast, measured

Limits. No critical edition or facsimile was consulted. The audio was measured but not listened to by the build or the reviewer. The UNESCO page was unreachable, so no UNESCO figures are used. Reign dates and the banate's territory rest on Wikipedia.

Sources and documents

In the repository: fact sheet · storyboard · historical note · source code